There are many kinds of evidence to be examined and many experts called upon to lend their expertise. The use of a forensic handwriting expert is one of the most important components to many legal proceedings these days. Here are some examples of criminal cases where this has been the case.
Welcome to the Jim Fisher True Crime blog, a place for people interested in crime, criminal investigation, policing, law, and forensic science. At the year-old unemployed carpenter's trial held in Flemington, New Jersey in January and Februaryprosecution handwriting experts took the stand and testified that the defendant had written all of the ransom notes as well as other documents associated with the abduction and murder.
It was this forensic document evidence that sent Mr.
Hauptmann to the death house in Trenton. At the Lindbergh-Hauptmann trial, eight nationally known questioned document examiners, from Los Angeles to New Lindbergh handwriting analysis cases City, both private and government employed, testified that Hauptmann wrote the fifteen ransom letters, including the note left by the kidnapper in the baby's nursery.
The Lindbergh crime produced an unusually large quantity of questioned writing. Moreover, the experts had plenty of known handwriting to work with in the form of request writings--a carefully worded paragraph dictated to Hauptmann--and his conceded or "course of business" writings in the form of his personal notebooks and his auto registration, driver's license, and insurance applications.
The prosecution experts testified that Hauptmann's known writing looked like the writing in the ransom documents. They produced dozens of word chart exhibits for the jury that illustrated the similarity in the two sets of cursive writing. Hauptmann and the ransom note writer also misspelled certain words the same way.
The questioned document testimony phase of the Lindbergh-Hauptmann trial took up four days, and produced pages of trial transcript. Besides the eight experts who took the stand, the prosecution had four rebuttal experts who would have testified against Hauptmann had the defense put on a credible battery of their own handwriting witnesses.
As it turned out, these rebuttal witnesses were not needed. One the the rebuttal witnesses, John Vreeland Haring, later published a heavily illustrated book showing why he believed Hauptmann had written the ransom documents.
Haring made a special effort to illustrate the similarities between the defendant's writing and the ransom note left in the nursery. For comparison purposes, Haring used as known handwriting samples, two post-conviction letters Hauptmann had written in hand to the Governor of New Jersey.
In addition to the prosecution's eight handwriting witnesses and the four rebuttal experts, Charles A. The crime lab director testified against Hauptmann before the Bronx Grand Jury months before the trial.
Hauptmann's defense attorney, Edward J. Reilly, asked seven document examiners to look at the handwriting evidence. Three declared that Hauptmann had written the documents, another three said the ransom notes had been altered after Hauptmann's arrest to look like his known writing--thereby conceding that the known and questioned writings were similar.
The seventh examiner asked by the defense to analyze the evidence, a man named John C. A reporter who covered the Lindbergh-Hauptmann trial wrote this about Mr. And his testimony was really pathetic. Hauptmann's defense lawyers--he had five--were never able to counter the prosecution's overwhelming handwriting case against their client.
Notwithstanding all of the other physical evidence connecting Hauptmann to the crime, it was his handwriting that sent him to the electric chair.
To this day, the Lindbergh case remains the high water mark in the American history of forensic document examination.yet no initial suspects had comparable handwriting •Wood analysis Lindbergh Case Hauptmann’s First Exemplar Letter Hauptmann was asked to write almost a dozen exemplar letters so that his handwriting could be compared to the ransom notes NARA, RGN Transcript of The Case of Lindbergh JR.
and Regarding Handwriting Analysi. Handwriting Analysis on The Ransom Notes: The Case of Lindbergh J.R.
Regarding Handwriting Analysis Background: Charles Lindbergh was a famous aviator. He and his wife, Anne had their first child in Start studying Handwriting, Forgery, and Ink Analysis.
Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. s Lindbergh: handwriting analysis important case Handwriting Analysis, Forgery, and Counterfeiting. 57 terms. Forensics Book 52 terms. Transcript of The Case of Lindbergh JR. and Regarding Handwriting Analysi. Handwriting Analysis on The Ransom Notes: The Case of Lindbergh J.R.
Regarding Handwriting Analysis Background: Charles Lindbergh was a famous aviator. He and his wife, Anne had their first child in Handwriting "Evidence" in the Lindbergh Case Although none of these "experts" ever linked Hauptmann's handwriting to the original nursery note no one seemed to notice - (please refer to the LKH Forum arguments below.) "An examination, comparison and analysis of the questioned ransom notes and.
A painstaking analysis of Hauptmann’s handwriting by the Bureau’s new crime lab showed a remarkable similarity between the lettering of the author of the ransom notes and of Hauptmann.